Young Adulthood -- 19 to 40 years Conflict: In this stage, the most important events are love relationships.
See other articles in PMC that cite the published article. Intimacy was defined as the potential to establish close relationships involving high levels of communication, closeness, and commitment.
Hierarchical logistic regression revealed a significant Gender X Intimacy interaction in predicting marital status at midlife.
Women but not men with low intimacy in college had higher risk of divorce in midlife in the sample. Within the past decade, marriage in the United States has come under increasing scrutiny by governmental and religious institutions.
Cohabitation, domestic partnerships, same sex marriages, parenthood outside of wedlock, blended families, and postponement of marriage have received increased public awareness Hackstaff, Bureau of the Census, Clearly relevant to understanding the factors that predict divorce is an understanding of marital satisfaction.
Surprisingly, although there is extensive literature on marital satisfaction, relatively few studies focus on predictors of divorce, and even fewer employ a prospective design in which individuals or couples are studied prior to marrying.
Among the available divorce prediction studies, characteristics of the couple rather than the individual partners serve as the main explanatory variables.
For example, using data from three longitudinal samples, Vaillant found that maturity of defense mechanisms was correlated with long-term marital stability. Although useful, this study did not employ a prospective design. The Construct of Intimacy Intimacy is a complex construct that is notoriously difficult to define and operationalize.
As such, Erikson emphasized three elements of the capacity for intimacy: Isolation, at the opposite pole of the spectrum, is characterized by an inability to commit, share deep feelings, and communicate.
Thus, we suggest that individuals who are able to resolve intimacy issues successfully in young adulthood have a greater chance of maintaining a stable marital relationship through midlife. Conversely, we expect that young adults who are isolated are less likely to sustain a relationship, if they even marry.
Of course, intimacy as a quality of the individual should bear a connection to the interactions that take place between married partners. The interpersonal model defines intimacy as a reciprocal process in which the behavior and feelings of one partner influence the other and hence, the quality of the relationship.
For example, if self-disclosure by one partner is followed up by active listening and responding by the other, the original partner will be even more likely to engage in self-disclosure.
We propose that intimacy, conceived of in the Eriksonian tradition as a developmental quality, serves as an important link between the interpersonal model of relationship quality and divorce in midlife.
Thus, the ability to experience intimacy in young adulthood provides the foundation for the subsequent reciprocal interactions that either sustain and promote or reduce and detract from the quality of the marital relationship.
Gender Differences in Intimacy Differences between men and women in the expression of intimacy, well documented in the literature Hyde,result from early socialization processes that precede young adulthood. After childhood, according to this view, women and men continue to interact differently in relationships in ways that affect patterns of romantic relationships and marriage.
Philpot, Brooks, Lusterman and Nutt suggest that men and women develop in different cultures that support different value systems, personality characteristics, communication styles, problem-solving techniques, gender roles, sexuality, and expectations for relationships.The crisis that arises in young adulthood is concerned with: Conflict At each stage of Erikson's theory of psychosocial development, people experience a turning point referred to as a.
Question: According to Erikson, the central conflict of young adulthood is. Erik Erikson: Erik Erikson was a psychologist and psychoanalyst who lived during the 20th century. A Study About Intimacy and Isolation Being a Developmental Conflict of Young Adulthood PAGES 2.
WORDS 1, View Full Essay.
More essays like this: developmental conflict of young adulthood, alex and lynne, alcohol problem. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University.
Moving from infancy to old age, these conflicts are trust versus mistrust, autonomy versus shame and doubt, initiative versus guilt, industry versus inferiority, identity versus role diffusion, intimacy versus isolation, generativitythat is, creativity and productivity-- . The major conflict under the intimacy versus isolation theory of Erik Erikson centers on forming loving and intimate relationships with other people.
Intimacy pertains to good emotional and physical health wherein a person's perspective now moves from an "I" to a "We" perspective.
Dec 01, · Although issues related to intimacy can continue throughout adulthood (Whitbourne, Sneed, & Sayer, ), Erikson theorized that individuals are maximally vulnerable to the crisis in young adulthood and it is then that intimacy may serve as a predictor for divorce in midlife.
Thus, we suggest that individuals who are able to resolve intimacy issues successfully in young adulthood have a .